Nov. 2nd, 2008

redaxe: (Self-Drawing Hand)
redaxe: (Ogre Claus and Fiona)
In all the push to defeat Prop 8 (aka Prop Hate) in California, several equally abhorrent measures elsewhere are getting less attention than they deserve.

Florida has Proposition 2, aka the Florida Marriage Amendment, the language of which reads on the Florida ballot: "This amendment protects marriage as the legal union of only one man and one woman as husband and wife and provides that no other legal union that is treated as marriage or the substantial equivalent thereof shall be valid or recognized." See that, there? Not only would it enact discrimination (as 26 other states have already done), but it would dissolve existing civil unions between straight couples who have not chosen to marry, for reasons of their own. This lovely YouTube video gets right to the heart of why that's important. And, of course, the amendment precludes judicial review, which is the recourse of those who know perfectly well that they're proposing something which can't stand the light of day. (Like cockroaches, or rats.) For more information on the amendment and how to defeat it, SayNo2 and Florida Red and Blue are your destinations.

Arizona also has a constitutional amendment on its ballot, Prop 102. It, too, would enact the discrimatory language of "only one man and one woman" marriage into Arizona's constitution. Having already been rejected in 2006, it would be nice to think that Arizona would again reject this nastiness. Unfortunately, that's far from certain. Given that the measure was placed on the ballot under questionable conditions (in which it was being filibustered and the floor was given to a supporter of the measure; the state Senate Ethics Committee found that it was fair, but the vote was along party lines; given the consistent unethical behavior of the Republican party, who controlled the Senate, that committees's fairness is itself questionable), it would be good to see it shot down once more. Vote No on Prop 102 and Arizona Together: Help Defeat Prop 102 for more information.

For those may have who wondered why I haven't participated in the "marriage meme", it's because I haven't made the effort. But this ought to clear up the fact that I believe that marriage is NOT a special case of one man and one woman; rather, it's an opportunity for consenting adults to proclaim and confirm their love for each other, in whatever number and combination they mutually choose. It's nobody else's business which genders or numbers participate.
redaxe: (Self Portrait)
Not so random memory (brought on by current radio fare):

The summer after graduating high school. Thoroughly stoned, laying back on a pair of beds along with some friends, looking at the starscape painted in bleach on the ceiling of my friend's room, illuminated by a black (ultraviolet) light. On the stereo, me hearing it for the first time, was Dark Side of the Moon. (It was 1978, but I had been raised really square, and never heard it before.) Nobody warned me, so when the alarms rang at the beginning of "Time", I leaped about three feet in the air.

Thirty years ago. Wow.
redaxe: (Ogre Claus and Fiona)
This time, Professor Lawrence Lessig. I can't seem to get the embed working, so here's the link to the video. It's eight minutes, and worth every second.

And please, if you live in California, or know anyone who does, volunteers are desperately needed for the last push to defeat this heinous discrimination.

Profile

redaxe: (Default)
redaxe

October 2012

S M T W T F S
  123456
789 10111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28 293031   

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 9th, 2025 06:44 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios