A good article on the decline of LJ
Sep. 7th, 2012 12:06 pmSadly, this article has it exactly right:
There's still a great deal of good, fun, and value here at LJ. But it's not what it was, and it missed a chance to be what it could have been, because of horrific attitudes and actions at the top.
What a shame. (via Metafilter)
From roughly 2002 to 2007, a core part of discussion-heavy fandom and writing communities existed entirely on LiveJournal. LJ was unique among social media networks for a long time because so much of fandom communication happened in a central location. Though other journaling platforms like DeadJournal, GreatestJournal (both now defunct), InsaneJournal, and JournalFen existed, LJ was the central fandom hub due to the ease of combining community discussion with fanwork.
Over the last half-decade, however, that community has eroded. LiveJournal has been mired in dysfunction and bad public relations. Especially prominent since Fitzpatrick’s departure in 2005 has been an ongoing cycle of friction between LJ and its userbase:
1) LJ makes business and site design changes without notifying or listening to its userbase.
2) When the userbase responds with outrage, LJ fails to acknowledge or respond in a timely manner; when it does respond, it often acts like nothing is wrong or fails to apologize.
3) Eventually, LJ retracts its latest decision and things go back to normal, but with the trust of the userbase decayed.
4) Repeat steps 1-3.
There's still a great deal of good, fun, and value here at LJ. But it's not what it was, and it missed a chance to be what it could have been, because of horrific attitudes and actions at the top.
What a shame. (via Metafilter)