(no subject)
Jul. 6th, 2010 10:27 amWhat Glenn said:
The only words I have to add are "abominable", "disgusting", and "throw the folks who thought this up and enforce it into jail -- the sooner and nastier, the better." "Unconstitutional" comes to mind, as do others that a saintly, innocent person such as myself isn't supposed to know (or at least not use publicly).
[L]ocal police and federal officials work with BP to harass, impede, interrogate and even detain journalists who are covering the impact of the spill and the clean-up efforts.
...
The very idea that government officials are acting as agents of BP (of all companies) in what clearly seem to be unconstitutional acts to intimidate and impede the media is infuriating. Obviously, the U.S. Government and BP share the same interest -- preventing the public from knowing the magnitude of the spill and the inadequacy of the clean-up efforts -- but [the] creepy police state behavior [described before this paragraph] is intolerable.
...
Journalists who come too close to oil spill clean-up efforts without permission could find themselves facing a $40,000 fine and even one to five years in prison under a new rule instituted by the Coast Guard late last week. [Emphasis by Greenwald]
It's a move that outraged observers have decried as an attack on First Amendment rights. And CNN's Anderson Cooper describes the new rules as making it "very easy to hide incompetence or failure". [emphasis again by Greenwald]
...
A "willful" violation of the new rule could result in Class D felony charges, which carry a penalty of one to five years in prison under federal law.
The only words I have to add are "abominable", "disgusting", and "throw the folks who thought this up and enforce it into jail -- the sooner and nastier, the better." "Unconstitutional" comes to mind, as do others that a saintly, innocent person such as myself isn't supposed to know (or at least not use publicly).